Quantcast
Channel: Respect: SALAM ALQUDS ALAYKUM – سلام القدس عليكم
Viewing all 27504 articles
Browse latest View live

ONLY THEN SHALOM MAY PREVAIL

$
0
0



By Gilad Atzmon
PM Netanyahu told President Obama earlier today that “Palestinians are failing to advance peace.” 
Netanyahu was obviously correct!
1. Palestinians must stop oppressing Israelis and Jews.
2. If the Palestinians want peace, they better end the occupation immediately.
3. The Palestinians must stop building in the West Bank.
4. And if the Palestinians want peace for real, they better give up on the racist, supremacist, anti Jewish  idea that Israel becomes a true democracy and a state of its citizens.
Only then Shalom may prevail.

Crazy Senator McCain, says “Iran Is The World’s Leading Sponsor Of Terror!”

Putin faces down Obama over Ukraine

$
0
0

Russian President Vladimir Putin
Russian President Vladimir Putin

By Finian Cunningham

American exceptionalism has gone into overdrive with stern warnings from US President Barack Obama to Russia to respect Ukrainian sovereignty and to not destabilize the region.

By "American exceptionalism" we mean Washington's seemingly unlimited capacity for exceptional arrogance and double think.

Obama has not yet accused Russia outright of "military invasion" in the crisis-torn country, but that was the clear inference from his weekend press conference. In a veiled threat of military confrontation, the American president warned that there would be "costs" for Moscow.

"Any violation of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity will be deeply destabilizing and the US stands with the international community to affirm that there will be costs [for this violation]," said Obama in a hastily arranged media statement in Washington on Friday.

The White House is obviously rattled by reports of Russian troop movements across Ukraine's southern Crimean Peninsula. Moscow says that its military presence in the autonomous Crimean republic of Ukraine is fully in accord with a long-standing legal agreement to have its soldiers stationed there as part of its Black Sea naval base.

That agreement was renewed in 2010 between Moscow and Kiev for a further 20 years, affording Russian military presence in the Crimea, particularly the naval base at Sevastopol, which is headquarters for Russia's Black Sea fleet.

Russian ambassador to the United Nations Vitaly Churkin denied that Russia had invaded Ukraine's territory and said, "We are operating under this agreement [with Ukraine]."

Events in Crimea took on a chaotic twist in recent days when unknown armed men took over the local parliament and the Russian flag was hoisted. There were also other reports of large troop deployments at the main civilian airport and other facilities. Soldiers were not wearing identifiable uniforms, but there were unconfirmed reports that armored vehicles bore Russian military insignia.

Under the existing military lease of the naval base at Crimea's Sevastopol, Russia is permitted to station thousands of troops on the Peninsula, and Moscow has in the past routinely engaged in maneuvers there.

However, it is stretching naivety to believe Moscow's claims that the recent surge in military movements is merely "routine". The Crimean activity coincides with other large-scale mobilization of Russian troops as well as military aircraft on Russia's broader border with Ukraine.

But here's the laughable irony of Obama's protestations. The latest apparent Russian military moves follow months of US-sponsored destabilization in Ukraine. This illegal and covert American interference has trampled all over Ukrainian sovereignty, which ironically Obama is now accusing his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin of doing.

Since Ukraine spurned a tentative trade agreement with the European Union at the end of last November, street protests have escalated in the Ukrainian capital, Kiev. Washington and its European allies, including Britain, France and Germany, have done everything to escalate these protests, from high-profile political statements to clandestine military infiltration through the organs of the CIA. The demonstrations in Kiev quickly took on a quasi-military character with sinister fascist elements using firearms and other forms of violence to seize and occupy government buildings. That rapidity betrays the pre-meditated external nature of the "protests".
There are reliable reports that many of the deaths in clashes between Ukrainian police and protesters were actually caused by Western-backed provocateurs and snipers in a deliberate attempt to inflame the crisis. Washington has infiltrated Ukraine with the CIA and a myriad other so-called "non-governmental organizations" since the early 1990s - with the objective of agitating regime change in the former Soviet Republic.

US State Department official Victoria Nuland recently disclosed that Washington has "invested" some $5 billion in "promoting democracy" (that is, subversion and sedition) in Ukraine over the past two decades.

The crisis came to a head when the embattled elected Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych fled suddenly from his office last week and went into exile in Russia. The Ukrainian parliament has since been taken over by his Western-backed opponents and a new interim government installed. Washington and Brussels swiftly moved to recognize this so-called new authority in Kiev, but Russia, with sound legal reasoning, has denounced the sacking of the elected Yanukovych and his government as a coup d'état.

The turmoil in Ukraine has therefore all the hallmarks of a Washington-led regime-change operation. Needless to say that is a wholly criminal interference that makes a mockery of international law. The ultimate target of this meddling, as has been brazenly stated over many years since the early 1990s by Zbigniew Brzezinski and other US imperial planners, is the destabilization of Russia itself.

Risibly, Washington's new puppet president in Kiev, Oleksandr Turchynov, has now accused Russian forces of "seizing and capturing" the regional parliament and other government buildings in Ukraine's southern Crimea. This complaint comes from political agitators who used violence and other crimes, including the murder of policemen, to seize government buildings in Kiev, culminating in the ousting of an elected president.

In all this, Russian President Vladimir Putin has maintained a cagey silence. But the Russian leader knows only too well the depth of American deception and hypocrisy, and Washington's covert agenda for regime change - an agenda which is being ruthlessly pursued against Russia's Arab ally, Syria.

For now, Moscow seems to be effecting an air of calm legality and playing by the rules, citing that its troops in Crimea are part of its bilateral military agreement with the Ukraine.

But, off the record, the Americans know that what Putin is really saying is this: "You want to break the law, well, OK, we can break it too. Now back off!"

Rules of sovereignty and international law are out the window, and it is Washington and its European puppets who threw all norms out that window with their incessant, illegal interference in Ukraine. Ukrainian territory, and its centuries of shared history, is a vital interest for Russia.
Putin is entirely right to lay down an unspoken military marker to Washington over Ukraine, just like he did when the Americans tried to mess militarily with South Ossetia in 2008 through its NATO proxy, Georgia.

American exceptionalism of arrogance and lawlessness does not understand the language of diplomacy. The only language it responds to is blunt force talking back to force.

FC/SL

ANTHONY LAWSON: SYRIA - THE CRIME AND THE CRIMINALS

$
0
0

The Syrian civil war, insurrection, rebellion, revolt, uprising, call it what you will, was not home grown in Syria by Syrians with differing outlooks as to how their nation should be governed—as the mainstream media would have you believe—it was part of a strategy pre-planned by vicious, sociopathic foreigners called “Neocons” and they began their planning in 1991, following the first invasion of Iraq, code-named: Dessert Storm.  To date, the major beneficiary of their diabolical planning has been the Jewish State, but that maybe coming to an end.

The Damn Fool in the White House

$
0
0


March 3rd, 2014  
by Stephen Lendman

Geopolitical conditions today are incendiary. Obama's war on Syria rages. No end in sight looms.

Washington manipulated peace talks to fail. Odds favor full scale US intervention. Doing so risks regional war.

In late February, Israel bombed Hezbollah targets. It did so along Lebanon's border with Syria.

Hezbollah vowed to respond "at the appropriate time." It justifiably denounced "blatant" Israeli "aggression."

Washington and Israel partner in regional adventurism. Do Obama and Netanyahu want war on Lebanon? Are they planning regional conflict?

Will Iran be targeted? Will US-orchestrated Venezuelan violence continue? Will other nations be targeted for regime change?

The damn fool in the White House risks global war. Ukraine is a major flashpoint. Conditions today are the most dangerous since the 1962 missiles of October crisis.
Jack Kennedy was president. Early in his administration he changed from cold warrior to peacemaker.

He wanted all nuclear weapons abolished. He favored "general and complete disarmament." He wanted all US forces out of Vietnam by December 1965.


He wanted to "splinter the CIA in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds."


After resolving the 1962 crisis, he said he "never had the slightest intention" of confronting Cuba or Soviet Russia aggressively.


The damn fool in the White House is no Jack Kennedy. Neocons infest his administration. Rogue elements make policy.


Ousting Ukraine's democratically elected government was planned long before violence erupted last November.


Obama partnered with neo-Nazis extremists. He's got a tiger by the tail. Millions of Ukrainians reject them. Expect millions more to join them once their agenda becomes apparent.


Eastern Ukraine is largely pro-Russian. Crimeans may choose independence. East/West tensions keep escalating.


The damn fool in the White House risks war. He outrageously warned Putin against intervening.


On Saturday, Russia's upper house Federation Council authorized use of military forces in Crimea.


Putin requested deployment permission to protect the safety of Russian nationals.
On Sunday, RIA Novosti reported "(l)arge movements of Russian troops...around the (Crimean) peninsula…"


Western media headlines lied. They screamed Russian invasion. The CIA-linked Washington Post claimed "Russian forces seize(d) Crimea."


Neo-Nazi coup d'etat interim Ukraine president Oleksandr Turchynov accused Russia of "direct aggression against the sovereignty of Ukraine."


Neocon WaPo editors headlined "Condemnation isn't enough for Russian actions in Crimea."


"Invasion," they screamed. They outrageously accused Putin of "provoking a separatist rebellion..."


Obama and EU partners "must act quickly to prevent Ukraine's dismemberment," they said.
They support Ukraine's illegitimate xenophobic, ultranationalist, anti-Semitic, neo-Nazi coup plotters. They demand Moscow recognize them.


They demand Obama order a "heavy price" otherwise. They want Western monied interests given a free hand to rape and pillage Ukraine. They barely stopped short of urging war.


On Saturday, Obama and Putin spoke for 90 minutes. The damn fool in the White House wrongfully accused him of breaching international law.


He threatened unspecified "costs." Washington won't participate in upcoming preparatory G-8 talks, he said. Russia risks political and economic isolation, he added.


Ukrainians have the right to determine their own future, he claimed. His orchestrated coup denies them entirely.


Putin won't be bullied. He won't roll over for Washington. He'll responsibly defend Russian interests.


He'll do so, he told Obama. He'll protect the safety and security of Crimean Russian nationals, he said. He'll do so in other eastern areas if needed.


Real threats exist. He'll address them responsibly. If violence threatens Russian nationals, he'll take "all necessary measures" against it.


He'll do so "within the framework of international law."He stressed the need to prevent crisis conditions from escalating. He expressed concern about Kiev ultranationalist putschists usurping power.


Security Council members held an emergency Saturday session. 



Vitaly Churkin is Russia's UN ambassador.

Crimean authorities requested Russian help, he said. Claims about invading Russian forces are false.


"In the eastern part of Ukraine and Crimea in particular, we have seen the emergence of people from Kiev with a clear intention of repeating what has been happening in the Western part of Ukraine," he said.


Coup plotters "want to replace regional governments," he stressed.


Radicalized elements control Kiev, he added. They replaced what remains of legitimate Ukrainian governance.


Churkin called on Security Council members to act responsibly. He wants them to tell Kiev elements to refrain from violence.


Gunmen attempts to seize control of Crimean government buildings were foiled, he explained.


Russia's Federation Council authorized limited stabilizing military forces "on the territory of Ukraine" until "socio-political" conditions "normal(ize)."


Putin hasn't yet ordered it, he said. Claims otherwise are false. Or that Russia intends using military force against Ukraine.


Churkin urged all sides act "with cool heads." He wants Security Council members to order reinstitution of the February 21 agreement.


He wants Ukraine's legitimate government respected. He recommended establishing national unity governance.


Events in Ukraine remain fluid. Voice of Russia (VOR) reported mass defections from Ukraine's military serving in Crimea.


Deployed units are joining local self-defense forces. Soldiers doing so reject Kiev putschists. They resigned from Ukraine's military. Key is what its commanders do ahead.
At the same time, thousands of pro-Moscow supporters rallied in eastern Ukrainian cities. They back Russia's anti-Kiev position.


On Saturday, RT.com headlined "Ukrainian Navy flagship takes Russia's side - report."
The Hetman Sahaidachny reportedly refused to follow Kiev orders. It hoisted the Russian flag.


Federation Council member Igor Morozov said it "c(ame) over to our side today." The move came after Ukraine's "Navy command resigned Friday," said RT.


Coup d'etat president Aleksandr Turchinov appointed Rear Admiral Denis Berezovsky new navy chief.


He defected straightaway. "I, Berezovksy Denis, swear allegiance to the Crimean people and pledge to protect them, as required by (military) regulations.," he said.


The Hetman Sahaidachny headed home to Sevastopol after taking part in a Yanukovych authorized counter-piracy operation with NATO and the EU.


On Saturday, Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev spoke to his illegitimate Ukrainian counterpart, Arseniy Yatsenyuk. He urged both sides prioritize stability.


He said Russia reserves the right to protect "the lawful interests of citizens and servicemen deployed in the territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea."


If needed, Russian forces "have the right to act in the framework of the mandate issued by the Federation Council to the president," he added.


Ukrainian officials act irresponsibly "if they make unlawful decisions on the use of force against Russian citizens," he stressed.


On Sunday, Ukraine's coup d'etat parliament held an emergency closed-door session. Reports suggest martial law may be imposed.


Neo-Nazis operate this way. Rule of law principles don't matter. Imposed tyranny ups the stakes further.


It remains to be seen how western Ukrainians react. Expect eastern ones to ignore Kiev diktats. What happens then is up for grabs.



On Sunday, Crimean Prime Minister Vladimir Konstantinov told Kiev to stay out of Crimea's business.

"You in Kiev sort it out between yourselves, and we will deal with the republic's problems," he said.


Most Crimean law enforcement and military officials feel the same way, he added. They support local defense forces.


They want protection from anti-Russian elements. Konstantinov warned Kiev against forcefully trying to usurp control in Crimea as well as other areas resisting its authority.
On March 2, Ukraine's Belgorod Governor Yevgeny Savchenko said three pro-Russian regions reported increasing refugee flows.


Thousands from southern, eastern and central Ukraine came to Belgorod. They reject Kiev authority. They're concerned for their safety.


Rostov Region Governor Vasily Golubev said Ukrainians no longer feel safe in their country. Bryansk Region Governor Nikolay Denin said the same thing.


Russia's Federal Border Guard Service estimates around 675,000 Ukrainians sought refuge in Russia in January and February.


Expect many thousands more to join them. Chaotic conditions drive them to seek safety.
On Saturday, Russian immigration authorities reported 143,000 asylum requests in a two week period. They promised expedited processing of their requests.


According to Federal Migration Service citizenship department head Valentina Kazakova:
"The tragic events in Ukraine have sharply increased the number of applications to regional migration authorities."


"People are bewildered, frightened and despondent, she added.


Increasing numbers of Ukrainians living in Russia are applying for citizenship.


The neocon infested Project for the New American Century (PNAC) renamed itself the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI).


Its directors and staff include a rogue's gallery of hard-right extremists. They deplore peace. They crave war. On March 1, they issued a statement on Russia's so-called "intervention in Ukraine."


They lied claiming "Putin has violated Ukrainian sovereignty..." Obama 'warned' him, they said. '(T)here will be costs for any military intervention in Ukraine,' he said.
FPI rogues want Obama to "lead the world (in) impos(ing) (them) and to ensure his bullying fails."


They demand Putin renege on his promise to protect Crimean Russian nationals.
They want John Kerry and Chuck Hagel to visit Kiev. They want them to "show solidarity" with its neo-Nazi coup d'etat government.


They want bilateral US/Russian discussions suspended unrelated to ongoing events.
They want financial sanctions imposed on Russian officials.


They want NATO member states having the option of abandoning NATO-Russia Founding Act of 1997 provisions.


They include prohibiting NATO force deployments in former Warsaw Pact countries. Ten, including former Soviet republics, are NATO member nations.


"It is critical that the United States and the international community make clear to President Putin that his military intervention in Ukraine is unacceptable, and will isolate the Russian government diplomatically, politically and economically," said FPI.


"Failure to do so will only reward President Putin's indefensible and dangerous actions, and could embolden him to take further actions towards Ukraine and its neighbors."
Obama's administration is infested with FPI type extremists. How he'll respond to events remains to be determined.


At stake is world peace. Will the damn fool in the White House undermine it further? His track record isn't encouraging.

-###-
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached atlendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book is titled "Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity"
http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com
Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.
It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour

US warns Russia that the world is watching

THE WAR AGAINST TREVOR (LABONTE)

$
0
0

Gilad Atzmon interviews Trevor Labonte

Until two years ago, Trevor LaBonte was one of the most successful Jazz artists in Texas. He had been performing every night and in the most prestigious venues. He was the first-call guitar player for many of Austin’s prominent musicians. But then it all changed.
Gilad Atzmon: Trevor you were a local Jazz hero, what happened?
Trevor LaBonte: An activist named Craig Berlin, owner of Pro-Tape Staff in Austin, organized a campaign  to destroy my career by terrorizing the entire Austin music community. He creates Facebook posts in which he tags 50 or 60 important people in town, and reports to them that I am a ‘Nazi,’ an ‘Anti-Semite,’ and a ‘holocaust denier.’ Berlin demands that everyone must do everything in their power to make sure I never play another note in public. At first, most people ignored him, but  then others took up his cause, including the radio DJ Andy Langer from KGSR, helping to make sure I have become a hate figure and completely ostracized.



Let me understand correctly, you didn’t publish a book or even an article, all that vile campaign against you was launched because you expressed some thoughts on your own Facebook page? Is it correct?
--Yes, that's what happened.
How have your friends reacted to this onslaught?
--They are confused and afraid, mostly. Many of them quietly agree with at least some of what I say, and they are still friends with me. But understandably, they are scared to be listed in a performance announcement with me, since they would be certain to draw the hissing and screeching and boycott of Craig Berlin's fans. Most of my friends are sad and just want to play music together. Anyone who tries to stick up for me, or just moderate the witch hunt against me,  risks being similarly attacked themselves. And the attacks are vile. Musicians are not used to being vilified for unusual opinions
I guess that it would be correct to argue that the entire Jazz community is strictly speaking terrorized by this Jewish campaign to ostracize you.
-- Many of the musicians in Austin are  Jewish and are among my friends. The campaign against me  is being orchestrated by about 10 Jewish people who have publicly agreed amongst themselves that I have fallen ‘gravely mentally ill’, must be taken immediately to a ‘psychiatric institution’ and be ‘heavily dosed with meds.’
This sounds familiar..
-- One  recommend that I be castrated by chainsaw.
This is clearly more radical treatment than the traditional rabbinical circumcision apparatus..
--There were many other violent threats and fantasies, which are an interesting and revealing response to my mission statement: I advocate universal human rights and opposition to supremacism, violence and corruption of all forms, Jewish, Christian or otherwise. I also believe in the free exchange of ideas and free speech.
I have now met your beautiful and kind girlfriend and your lovely parents. I saw a lot of fear, it seems that everyone around you is subject to harassment by Berlin and his defamation troopers, I even learned from venue owners that they were harassed by Berlin and his klan. Have you ever spoke to Craig? Did you meet him?
--We have only communicated briefly on Facebook. He keeps me blocked now, so I can't even see what he is saying about me, let alone defend myself. I have no choice except to just let him go crazy for the world to see. I hope this demonic ranting  helps people to understand the rampant madness raging in such obsessed minds.
I obviously looked at the accusations against you and they are indeed vile, You are quoted questioning on FB  "If Hitler was an evil dictator, then why did he have broad public support? Why did Germany love him so much? This is obviously a legitimate and valid question.
However when I visited your FB page I realized that you push it a bit further, you question the Holocaust official narrative. You ask “what about those ‘gas chambers?’ Where are they? Why were they never found?”
Trevor, do you realise that such questions are banned by in European countries? Why do you think there is an attempt to stop Holocaust revisionism? Why are you chased, what are they afraid of?
--Yes, I realize Holocaust revisionism is banned in 17  countries. But America is not one of them. Americans need to use their right to free speech to question traditional history of all kinds. The Holocaust is no different in that respect.
You have also suggested that Jews were highly involved with Bolshevism.  Truth can be offensive, but why is this the case?
-- In this case, the truth is offensive to Jews because, were it to become widely known, their whole narrative of history would have to change. The fact  is that Bolshevism was largely a Jewish supported cause. 
I am not a supporter of Bolshevism nor am I a Marxist, but I would simply argue that Jews used their dominance within the Bolshevik movement in order to promote their ethnic interests. I would agree that Jewish Bolsheviks carried on an element of Judeo centric supremacist righteousness.
-- I asked if Jews ran some of the camps of Gulag Archipelago because they harbored deep racial animosity toward the Russian people. I often like to phrase things as questions, and my intent is to get a historical and intellectual conversation started. Yes, they are pointed questions, and my goal is to lead to the conclusions  I have reached. More importantly, I want  people to question traditional versions of history. It's a very painful process, for me as well as for others, I am sure. I was shocked and upset to learn that 85% of the Bolshevik/Communist government were actually Jewish, something I did not know because it is not taught in any history class. How can Hitler be seen as the greatest mass-murderer of all time, when practically next door, people like Trotsy/Leiba Bronstein, Lazar Kaganovich, and Gengrich Yagoda were running completely amok?.The title of worst mass murderer has many competitors. 
What is the solution?
-- I think the best solution would be to discard our "political correctness" standards. We should be able to question any historical or political narrative.  That's the first amendment and I think it was created to allow difficult discussions exactly like these.  This is the only way we can start to approach the "truth" in history. No group, including Jewish people, should be allowed to control history.  In the south, we have not controlled the history of the Civil War and I also think that's a good thing.  
Thanks for your time Trevor. I would urge my readers and followers to contact Craig Berlin and to demand that he stop his hate campaign against you at once.  I am pretty sure that the tide will change soon. I had an incredible time staying with you and playing music together. However, for the first time I met a musician who was more outspoken than myself. In fact, never before have I had trouble because of the views of one of my band members. This was pretty funny and a very positive development indeed. 

Zionist Entity Seizes Arms Ships in Red Sea, Claims Heading to Gaza

$
0
0

Local Editor

05-03-2014

Zionist entity: the seized Klos-C ship The Zionist army said Wednesday that its navy seized a ship in the Red Sea that he claimed it was carrying dozens of advanced Iranian-supplied rockets that were intended for Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, World Bulletin website reported.

It said the Panamanian-flagged cargo vessel Klos-C was boarded in international waters without resistance from its 17-strong crew, and would be escorted to the Zionist port of Eilat within days.

"It was a complex, covert operation," army spokesman Lieutenant-Colonel Peter Lerner said of the seizure some 1,000 miles (1,800 km) from the Occupied Territories.

Zionist television footage showed what appeared to be marines inspecting a rocket claimed to be of M302 type, on the floor of a ship hold, with cement bags labeled "Made in Israel" in English next to it.

"The M302 in its most advanced model can strike over 100 miles," said Lerner.
Lerner noted the crew came from a number of different countries and there was no immediate indication that they knew the nature of their cargo.
Source: Websites
05-03-2014

Al-Nusra Front: No decision to transfer the conflict to Lebanon... yet

$
0
0

A young girl walks by the wreckage from a dual car bombing in Bir Hassan, south of Beirut. (Photo: Marwan Tahtah)
Published Wednesday, March 5, 2014
Speaking to Al-Akhbar, a commander in al-Nusra Front denied the appointment of "Emirs" from the front or from ISIS to manage the conflict in Lebanon. He revealed that both organizations are cooperating with "agents" to carry out bombings "meant to convey messages to Hezbollah."
The secrets of the bombings witnessed by Lebanon have not been revealed yet. Even the identities of some of the suicide bombers are still unknown. DNA tests conducted for forensic evidence have not assisted security forces who are still confused about the identity of the perpetrators.

There are still some questions about the attacks, which already took place, concerning the "failure of some to achieve their goals," the fact that some of the operations only led to the killing of the bomber, and "the low average losses of two or three victims." The only exceptions were the Iranian embassy attack and the Roueiss bombing, which registered the highest number of victims.
As for the background of the situation, there are only a few scenarios in circulation. They are based on information provided by suspects arrested for crimes of terrorism, who spoke of bombing schemes and planned suicide attacks against Dahiyeh, the Lebanese army, and Iranian interests in Lebanon involving two or three persons. The accusations are pointing to the three most prominent fundamentalist organizations on the field: al-Nusra Front, the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria/Levant (ISIS), and the Abdullah Azzam Brigades.
But did the ensuing arrests lead to weakening the capacities of al-Nusra and ISIS or are they unable to carry out major bombings in Lebanon, similar to those carried out in Iraq? The question is answered by a leader in al-Nusra Front in an interview with Al-Akhbar.
"Of course not. The two organizations possess the logistical and practical capacity to conduct such operations. However, in reality, the leadership of both organizations have not decided, yet, to break open the conflict on the Lebanese arena," he explains.
But he did not deny the possibility that this might change soon, maybe in just a few days, in light of developments on the Qalamoun front.
The aforementioned commander bases his comment on an issue, which is "fundamental to clarify the picture," saying "there are no emirs from al-Nusra Front or ISIS in Lebanon."
He says that "al-Nusra has not appointed an emir in Lebanon, neither did ISIS." Both organizations are working with "agents" in Lebanon, like Naim Abbas, he explains. The commander backs up his version based on the content of confessions leaked to the media, which said that detainees held by Lebanese security services worked with several organizations at the same time. He maintains this reinforces the "theory of agents and not the original."
"The jihadi method makes it imperative for individuals to swear allegiance and commitment to one organization," he adds. "Thus, they are not allowed to work for and under the leadership of another organization." He also reveals that "most of those arrested by security forces are involved in the execution and had nothing to do with planning or strategy, as rumored in the media." He says it was likely that an agent is being contacted for such operations, since the arrest of Abbas did not stop these types of bombings.

"Neither al-Nusra nor ISIS are incapable of conducting operations similar to those in Iraq," he indicates. "The target field in Lebanon is open and very wide. If the aim was to attack Shia or Hezbollah, it would be possible to conduct bombings in the South and the Bekaa, not just in Dahiyeh." As for the actual bombings, he puts them in the context of "messages to Hezbollah as a result of its intervention in Syria." He explains that targeting civilians is also "a message to the party's support to exert pressure for its withdrawal from Syria."
While the commander confirms that Naim Abbas was not working within the organizational framework of the Abdullah Azzam Brigades, he reveals that it is the only organization active in Lebanon as a "land of struggle and jihad." He stresses his point by indicating that the Roueiss and Iranian embassy bombings, which led to the highest number of casualties, were adopted by the Brigades, while the operations adopted by al-Nusra and ISIS led to "a few casualties" in comparison.
"The time has not yet come to open the Lebanese arena," he continues. However, "the jihadi leadership is firmly convinced that Hezbollah's existence is linked to the survival of the Syrian regime. Thus, the fall of the regime will lead to its automatic collapse in Lebanon."
On the other hand, the commander denies the news about the appointment of Sheikh Ahmad al-Assir as al-Nusra Front's emir, saying that Assir does not adhere to al-Qaeda's method to begin with. He maintains that Abu Sayyaf al-Ansari's request for allegiance by ISIS was rejected, because he announced it in the media before it was accepted by "ISIS emir Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, in addition to the absence of an actual decision to work formally as an emirate in Lebanon, until now."
In related news, sources close to Abdullah Azzam Brigades indicated that a new emir was appointed to lead them. But they did not reveal his identity, denying that it was one the names circulating in the media.
Follow Radwan Mortada on Twitter @radwanmortada
This article is an edited translation from the Arabic Edition.

Many non-Syrian terrorists killed during army operations

$
0
0


Mar 05, 2014

 Provinces, (SANA) Army units repelled Wednesday terrorists and destroyed their weapons, ammunition and hideouts in several provinces.

Army units eliminate terrorists and destroy their hideouts in Damascus Countryside

Army units destroyed two cars equipped with heavy machineguns and left a number of terrorists dead or injured in Yabroud city in Damascus countryside, while other units continued to progress in Rima farms after eliminating terrorists from Jabhet al-Nusra and destroying their equipment and weapons, in addition to eliminating terrorists north of Yabroud near the town of al-Sahl.

In Adra workers city, an army unit eliminated a number of terrorists from the Islamic front including two group leaders called Bilal Safir and Bashar Shalhoum, destroying their weapons and ammo.

The army also eliminated three terrorists in Harasta and clashed with a terrorist group in Jobar, killing a number of its members.

Most members of a terrorist group were killed during a special operation in al-Ebb farms in Douma which resulted in destroying large amounts of weapons and ammo, while other army units pursued terrorists in the town of Daraya, leaving several of them dead or injured and destroying their weapons and ammo.

Army units carried out a series of operations targeting terrorist hideouts in Khan al-Sheih and Zakiya in al-Kisweh area, eliminating many terrorists and destroying their vehicles, while other units eliminated a number of terrorists and injured over 15 others in a special operation in the mountains east of al-Zabadani.

Terrorists; gatherings destroyed, non-Syrians killed in Hama

An army unit destroyed a car for terrorists loaded with weapons and ammunition in Mourek town in Hama countryside and destroyed terrorists’ gatherings in the town, a military source told SANA.
The source added that a number of terrorists were killed and injured in the operations, including non-Syrians.
Saudi terrorists Hijri al-Sari and Sultan, who is nicknamed Abu al-Leil, and the Libyan terrorist Zakariya al-Tajer were identified among the dead.

Large number of non-Syrian terrorists killed in Idleb

A military source told SANA that army units eliminated a number of Iraqi, Saudi, Jordanian, Chadian, Tunisian, Egyptian and Afghan terrorists in Idleb countryside.
The source added that among the dead terrorists were Meta’b Ali al-Salam and Nashmeh Mohammad Burji from Saudi Arabi, Ramez Ahmad al-Dali and Farjhan Fawaz al-Dalimi fron Iraq, Bashir Hamid al-Sawam and Raslan Mohammad Baghal from Chad, Mohammad Obeid al-Said, Matar Ahmad al-Aqil and Barakat Mohammad al-Muhaimid, from Jordan, Badea Fareed al-Mkahel from Afghanistan, Ekrima Ahmad al-Rahil from Egypt, Farah Ali al-Farah and Ta’an Jumaa al-Farah from Kuwait , Darwaish Ibrahim Darwish from Turkey and Jihad Salem Barhoum from Tunisia.

Army kills Jabhat al-Nusra leaders in Daraa countryside

Army units eliminated a number of terrorists, among them leaders of Jabhat al-Nusra, and destroyed 2 of their cars to the south-west of al-Soura village in Daraa countryside.
A military source told SANA that terrorist Anas Mohammad al-Baset was identified among the dead.

Army units also targeted terrorists’ gatherings on the southwestern road of Um al-Aousaj toward al-Hrak city and the surrounding al-Yarmouk school in Daraa al-Balad, killing and injuring a number of terrorists.
English Bulletin






Syrian Army Advances in Rima Farms, Besieging Yabroud in Qalamoun

$
0
0
«كماشة الغوطة» تطوق حلب، وعزل يبرود يتواصل
Local Editor

The Syrian Army units repelled Wednesday terrorist
Syrian Armys and destroyed their weapons, ammunition and hideouts in several provinces.

Army units destroyed two cars equipped with heavy machineguns and left a number of terrorists dead or injured in Yabroud city in Damascus countryside, while other units continued to progress in Rima farms after eliminating terrorists from Jabhet al-Nusra and destroying their equipment and weapons, in addition to eliminating terrorists north of Yabroud near the town of al-Sahl.

In Adra workers city, an army unit eliminated a number of terrorists from the Islamic front including two group leaders called Bilal Safir and Bashar Shalhoum, destroying their weapons and ammo.

The army also eliminated three terrorists in Harasta and clashed with a terrorist group in Jobar, killing a number of its members.

Most members of a terrorist group were killed during a special operation in al-Ebb farms in Douma which resulted in destroying large amounts of weapons and ammo, while other army units pursued terrorists in the town of Daraya, leaving several of them dead or injured and destroying their weapons and ammo.

Army units carried out a series of operations targeting terrorist hideouts in Khan al-Sheih and Zakiya in al-Kisweh area, eliminating many terrorists and destroying their vehicles, while other units eliminated a number of terrorists and injured over 15 others in a special operation in the mountains east of al-Zabadani.

An army unit destroyed a car for terrorists loaded with weapons and ammunition in Mourek town in Hama countryside and destroyed terrorists’ gatherings in the town, a military source told SANA.

The source added that a number of terrorists were killed and injured in the operations, including non-Syrians.

Saudi terrorists Hijri al-Sari and Sultan, who is nicknamed Abu al-Leil, and the Libyan terrorist Zakariya al-Tajer were identified among the dead.


A military source told SANA that army units eliminated a number of Iraqi, Saudi, Jordanian, Chadian, Tunisian, Egyptian and Afghan terrorists in Idleb countryside.

The source added that among the dead terrorists were Meta’b Ali al-Salam and Nashmeh Mohammad Burji from Saudi Arabi, Ramez Ahmad al-Dali and Farjhan Fawaz al-Dalimi fron Iraq, Bashir Hamid al-Sawam and Raslan Mohammad Baghal from Chad, Mohammad Obeid al-Said, Matar Ahmad al-Aqil and Barakat Mohammad al-Muhaimid, from Jordan, Badea Fareed al-Mkahel from Afghanistan, Ekrima Ahmad al-Rahil from Egypt, Farah Ali al-Farah and Ta’an Jumaa al-Farah from Kuwait , Darwaish Ibrahim Darwish from Turkey and Jihad Salem Barhoum from Tunisia.

Army units eliminated a number of terrorists, among them leaders of Jabhat al-Nusra, and destroyed 2 of their cars to the south-west of al-Soura village in Daraa countryside.

A military source told SANA that terrorist Anas Mohammad al-Baset was identified among the dead.

Army units also targeted terrorists’ gatherings on the southwestern road of Um al-Aousaj toward al-Hrak city and the surrounding al-Yarmouk school in Daraa al-Balad, killing and injuring a number of terrorists.

Source: Agencies
05-03-2014 - 18:59 Last updated 05-03-2014


Related Articles


After you, my two generals

$
0
0

Justice Minister Ashraf Rifi (C) with a picture of President Michel Sleiman above him. (Photo: Haitham Moussawi)

Published Wednesday, March 5, 2014
Our problem was with the two generals, the president and the minister of justice, and now a third person has gotten involved rather crudely: the new minister of information, Ramzi Jreij. The Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation (LBC) interviewed him yesterday to get his opinion on Ashraf Rifi’s referral of Al-Akhbar to the public prosecutor to take legal action against the newspaper.
Jreij was asked about his opinion regarding Monday’s editorial titled “Lebanon Without a President.” Jreij, holding yesterday’s issue of Al-Akhbar, told LBC that Ibrahim al-Amin’s editorial contained insults against the president and his post, in reference to yesterday’s editorial – rather than the one from Monday. This is an error, so we will wait for the minister to clarify whether he was commenting on yesterday’s editorial, or whether there was an error in the editing of the report.


In reality, the minister of information seems to have missed the fact that Monday’s editorial was a political opinion about the contents of the president’s speech. It contained legitimate criticism of Michel Suleiman’s attitudes on what is a sensitive issue, that is, the Resistance. No matter what one has to say about some of the statements in the editorial, these express an opinion, and whoever wishes to understand them differently to provoke a confrontation, is free to do so.
Also, the minister of information, who is a legal expert, missed the fact that Tuesday’s editorial contained the equivalent of a “tip” to the public prosecutor, regarding counterfeiting perpetrated by the president when he was commander of the army, and accusations against the minister of justice over various irregularities.
In other words, does the minister of information, in his current capacity and as a legal expert, not know that he should go the judiciary and ask it to intervene to establish the truth? Here too, we did not know what the minister of information meant to say, or is the problem in the editing again?
In this regard, our position is clear; it says:
First: We at Al-Akhbar will not appear before the public prosecution until the president and the minister of justice are summoned to appear before the court to investigate all the accusations made against them. If some people believe that they have sufficient immunity to shield them from accountability or prosecution, then we give ourselves the right to be immune from being held accountable and prosecuted too.
The judiciary must act in order to prevent the political authorities from deciding what the press can publish; those type of decisions belong to the judiciary.
Second: Our position in rejection of any campaign targeting the Resistance against the occupation is irreversible. We will continue to question the patriotism and honor of anyone who assails the Resistance.
We will continue to criticize and expose all those who undertake political, media, or field actions against the Resistance. Will not wait for anybody’s approval, be it the political authorities, the judicial authorities, the security authorities, or the partisan authorities. Those who do not like this can take a hike!
Third: The silence of the press syndicate and the order of journalists over this frenzied campaign against the media by both the Court of Publications and the Ministry of Justice, could motivate the political authorities to press ahead in its battle to stifle opinions. However, these two unions only represent the persons of the members of their councils, and they no longer enjoy our confidence, until they wake up from their coma.

But what about the “tough guy” Minister of Justice Ashraf Rifi, who tweeted from Saudi Arabia that the time for debauchery and insults is behind us, promising to build a state of institutions?
Rifi has been in Saudi Arabia for several days. His office leaked information that he would be attending a technical conference, and meeting with Saudi officials on the sidelines.
So far, there has been no official confirmation from his office or Saudi media that he has arrived in Saudi, taken part in any conference, or met with Saudi officials. So what is he doing there exactly?


Of course, we will not embarrass Rifi and wait for him to tell us what he learned about Saudi justice, or ask him about his meetings. We also will not embarrass him and ask him whether it was him personally who tweeted yesterday, or whether someone else in Beirut, before he took permission from Rifi, tweeted on his behalf, and whether Rifi approved only after the fact.
But let us consider the following account. And let him and Saudi Arabia say what they want to say.
Last Sunday and throughout the next day, there were extensive phone calls being made between Riyadh, Jeddah, and Beirut. Security officials in the kingdom were asking persistently whether reports are true that Hezbollah intends to carry out a military-security move that would encompass all of Lebanon, in a repeat of May 7, 2008.
Saudi officials even asked security officers in their embassy in Beirut and Lebanese counterparts to quickly verify this information. When they were told that there were no indications that something like this was going to happen, the callers from Riyadh stressed that the information they had came from a “well-informed source,” requesting further information.
Many hours passed before the Saudi officials were convinced that the reports were unfounded. But in Beirut, some were interested to find out who was this source that unnerved the kingdom for more than 24 hours.
It soon turned out that it was Rifi himself, boasting to the Saudi officials with his information, which, he claimed, indicated that “Hezbollah is in a state of hysteria, and is planning to take action against its opponents.” Of course, as one official in Beirut said, “We all know what else Rifi told the Saudi officials: Help us fight Hezbollah.”
Going to court? Yeah right.
This article is an edited translation from the Arabic Edition.

The mufti of the Syrian opposition

$
0
0

A rebel fighter takes aim at the location of pro-regime fighters, in the northern Syrian city of Aleppo on March 3, 2014. (Photo: AFP-AMC/Mahmud Abdel Rahman)

By: Suhaib Anjarini

Published Wednesday, March 5, 2014

Since the start of the Syrian crisis, Abu Basir al-Tartousi played the role of the opposition’s mufti - issuing a number of religious edicts on how the uprising in Syria should take shape. Even though they might not have heard of him before, many protesters who took part in the demonstrations were following his edicts. A jihadi source told Al-Akhbar that “the opposition’s elite seized upon his edicts and through them they guided the masses.”

This is the biography of Tartousi who is considered “a member of one of the first generations of the mujahideen.”

At a time when the political and armed opposition have seen the rise and fall of so many figures, al-Tartousi has been a constant presence from the early days that had peaceful protests all the way to the jihadi phase. Although his name is not often mentioned in the media in connection with the Syrian crisis, his religious edicts have an undeniable strong presence, earning him the title of the opposition’s mufti.



His real name is Abdel Moneim Mustafa Halima. He was born in the coastal Syrian city of Tartus on October 3, 1959. “He was raised in a Salafi family,” according to a jihadi source and was always proud of the jihadi ideology that accompanied him since his childhood. Eventually he married a Palestinian woman and has four children from her.

Abu Basir was an active participant in the Muslim Brotherhood’s uprising in Syria that reached its peak in the 1980s. He was detained in 1976 at the age of 17 for four months on charges of writing jihadi graffiti on the walls of Tartus. At the time, he was in direct contact with some of the most well known jihadis, especially Adnan Akla. By 1980, he had become one of the jihadis who chose to flee to Jordan, which played at the time a role similar to that of Turkey in the current crisis.


Jordan was only a temporary stop for Abu Basir. From there he moved to Iraq, then Pakistan and finally Afghanistan in 1981. It is reported that he was “the first Arab jihadi there.” He met Abdullah Azzam in Peshawar and accompanied him on one of his jihadi trips to Afghanistan.

He also met Sheikh Jamil al-Rahman al-Afghani, one of the most prominent jihadi leaders at the time. Abu Basir wrote in one of his books that focused on his time in Afghanistan: “I stayed with him in his own home, working with him and his group for a period of over five months. I also had the honor of joining military fronts that were under the sheikh’s command.”

In the mid 1980s, he returned to Jordan. In 1987, he became Abu Musab al-Zarkawi’s neighbor in al-Maasoum neighborhood in al-Zarka in Jordan. He wrote in one of his books: “Abu Musab’s house was a few meters away from my house. At the beginning of his religious commitment, he became close to me and found recourse in some of my books and he would seek my advice on many issues.”

He published in Jordan several books before he was asked by the Jordanian intelligence to stop publishing any more books before running them by the intelligence agencies. But contrary to these instructions, he published a book entitled Rules of Apostasy, which resulted in his deportation.

After his deportation from Jordan, he chose to go to Yemen where he lived for about three years before getting arrested and deported. Next he headed to Malaysia where he lived illegally for several months and from there he went to Thailand and then Britain. According to a jihadi source, Abu Basir described Britain as “a country of infidels where he found freedom to preach Islam, a right he was denied in Muslim countries because of their infidel rulers.” In April 2012, he joined the fighting in Syria.

Abu Basir did not waiting for the Syrian crisis to write and theorize about jihad. Many jihadi movements, including ones that were active in Algeria and Somalia, already considered him a religious guide and he even issued religious edicts supporting the Taliban.

The uprising’s compass

From the start of the Syrian crisis, Abu Basir’s edicts were ready. They are the source of many of the practices that were adopted by the opposition. He has used several platforms to launch his edicts. First, his website that he set up during his stay in Britain. Then the Facebook page, the Islamic Opposition to the Syrian Regime, which he opened on March 20, 2011 and served as its admin. And a closed Facebook group whose members are among those “active in the the protest movement.”

Abu Basir was one of the first people to consecrate a sectarian discourse. He issued an edict in late March 2011, days after the protests began, arguing that “what mostly threatens the sectarian Qarmat (a ninth century Shia religious group) Syrian regime and accelerates its collapse is to diligently point out its sectarianism.”

”The goal of the Syrian revolution is the downfall of three regimes, the sectarian Syrian regime, the Iranian regime ,and Hezbollah.”
From the beginning, he announced that “the goal of the Syrian revolution is the downfall of three regimes, the sectarian Syrian regime, the rafida (a derogatory term for Shia Muslims) Iranian regime and its influence in Syria and the region ,and Hezbollah, the Lebanese rafida party.” Basir has been attacking Hezbollah since 2003 and it was within this context, that he propagated his famous claim that “ Hezbollah is taking part in killing Syrian protesters.”
He also issued a decree stating that “Syrians should abstain from paying taxes and bills until the regime falls.” He also called for the suspension of education in Syria issuing his motto “No schooling and no education before toppling the president.”

The godfather of the coordination committees and the Free Syrian Army

Few people know that Abu Basir was behind the idea of forming the revolution’s local coordination committees. He suggested forming committees “in cities and villages... that are independent and whose fate and decisions are not determined by one person or one political party.” In addition, he was a strong proponent of the idea of establishing a revolutionary military force on the ground. He said in this regard: “They want the revolution to be peaceful like Ghandi’s revolution in India, but God refuses to let it be anything but a jihad for His sake.” He even welcomed foreign military intervention in Syria which he argued is a good idea.

Since the outbreak of the Syrian crisis, Abu Basir was active in two respects. The first was issuing religious edicts and the second was establishing contacts with supporters of jihad, most prominently Kuwaiti Salafis, in order to procure material and moral support while they waited for the jihadi phase of the revolution to begin. The jihadi source told Al-Akhbar that “the role that Abu Basir played was central to providing support for the mujahideen.”

In April 2012, he decided that it was time to “call for jihad.” So he went to Turkey where he had several meetings with “some friends that support jihadi activities,” according to the source. Then he crossed the border into Syria where he established al-Fajr Islamic Movement which was launched from the Idlib countryside and whose activities would later on spread to Aleppo. He also played a central role in establishing al-Hak Brigade in Homs. These two groups became central allies with Ahrar al-Sham Islamic Movement whose cells were being clandestinely formed since May 2011 with direct ideological guidance from Abu Basir. Till this day, he is considered the movement’s “godfather and mufti” and through it, one of the most influential figures in the Islamic Front.

This article is an edited translation from the Arabic Edition.

Israeli Army Fires Missiles, Shells on Occupied Golan Heights, Injuries Recorded

$
0
0
Local Editor

A Syrian military source said the Zionist enemy violated Wednesday
Golan Heights33morning the Agreement on Disengagement in the occupied Syrian Golan by firing missiles and tank shells and opening machinegun fire, injuring a number of Internal Security Forces personnel and civilians.

The source clarified that the Zionist enemy launched at 6 am four missiles from al-Sateh hill and al-Khwein in the Golan towards the school and mosque of al-Hamidiyeh area and fired at 6:30 am four tank shells towards al-Hurriyeh site, in addition to opening fire by medium-sized machineguns towards al-Hamidiyeh site at 7:10 am.

Seven members of the Internal Security Forces and four civilians were injured in the Israeli aggression, according to the source.

"This aggression stresses once again the reality of the Zionist entity's direct involvement in backing and supporting the terrorist groups and proves beyond any doubt the extent of the existing coordination between the Zionist enemy and these groups, especially at this time when the terrorist groups are receiving severe strikes at the hands of the heroes of the Syrian Arab Army, in a desperate bid to mitigate the pressure on them," the source said.

It added that while the General Command of the Army and the Armed Forces "affirms that such acts of aggression won't discourage it from continuing its missions of chasing and eliminating the armed terrorist groups, it warns of the consequences of getting involved in such ventures and testing out combat capabilities."

Source: Agencies
05-03-2014 

Shaaban: Israel Undercovers Gunmen in Syria

Local Editor

Syria: media advisor of President Bashar al-Assad, Bouthaina ShaabanMedia advisor of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, Bouthaina Shaaban, said Monday that Damascus has obtained information about Zionist undercover of gunmen in Syria, adding that even Zionist officers are supervising the battles on Syrian ground.

Speaking to Al-Mayadeen TV, Shaaban expressed beliefs that the Zionist entity is using weapon convoys as an excuse to strike over Syrian and Lebanese territories.

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad himself also told an Argentinean newspaper a few months ago that the so-called 'Israel' is assisting the militants fighting in Syria.

“Israel is directly supporting the terrorist groups in two ways,” he stated.

“Firstly it gives them logistical support, and it also tells them what sites to attack and how to attack them," Assad said.
Source: Websites

04-03-2014 - 15:30 Last updated 04-03-014

Ukraine’s “Democratic Coup d’Etat”: Killing Civilians as a Pretext for Regime Change

$
0
0

Leaked Phone Conversation Reveals Opposition Involvement in sniper killings. The leaders of EuroMaidan ordered the shooting of their own supporters

Global Research, March 05, 2014
26 February 2014
neonazis ukraine
Update: Sniper killings of Opposition Protesters was Ordered by Opposition Leaders. The leaders of EuroMaidan ordered the shooting of their own supporters
In an earlier article, GR reported that twenty opposition Maidan  protesters were killed by professional snipers on February 20.  “This was not a spontaneous event resulting from clashes between protesters and riot police, nor was it marked by an exchange of gunfire between the police and the Neo-Nazi militia.” (See full article below)
The sniper killings had the hallmarks of a carefully planned operation. They happened within ‘the space of a few hours”. Moreover, the killings coincided with the meetings of President Viktor Yanukovych with a high level EU delegation. In a bitter irony, these targeted killings were used as a pretext to topple the government and issue an arrest warrant directed against president Yanukovych.
Based on the release of a controversial leaked telephone conversation, we are now in a position to confirm that the sniper fire on innocent civilians was ordered by the Neo-Nazi Maidan militia which is supported by Washington and NATO.
Acknowledged in a leaked telephone conversation between EU foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton and the Estonian foreign minister Urmas Paet that the Maidan opposition leaders were behind the sniper killings directed against opposition protesters and police:
Urmas Paet: “There is now stronger and stronger understanding that behind the snipers, it was not Yanukovich, but it was somebody from the new coalition,”
Catherine Ashton: “I think we do want to investigate. I mean, I didn’t pick that up, that’s interesting. Gosh,”
According to RT:  The telephone call “took place after Estonia’s Foreign Minister Urmas Paet visited Kiev on February 25 at the peak of clashes between the pro-EU protesters and security forces in the Ukrainian capital. Paet also recalled his conversation with a doctor who treated those shot by snipers in Kiev. She said that both protesters and police were shot at by the same people.”
Urmas Paet “And second, what was quite disturbing, this same Olga [Bogomolets] told as well that all the evidence shows that the people who were killed by snipers from both sides, among policemen and then people from the streets, that they were the same snipers killing people from both sides,” the Estonian FM stressed.
Catherine Ashton; “Well, yeah…that’s, that’s terrible.”
Urmas Paet: So that she then also showed me some photos she said that as a medical doctor she can say that it is the same handwriting, the same type of bullets, and it’s really disturbing that now the new coalition, that they don’t want to investigate what exactly happened,”
According to RT,  the telephone file was uploaded by officers of Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) loyal to president Viktor Yanukovich.
Below is the text of the original article published by GR on February 26, which recounts the chronology of these sniper attacks against civilians and police.
It should also be noted that several of the paramilitary leaders who ordered these attacks namely (Neo-Nazi Svoboda, Right Sector and UNA-UNSO) now occupy positions of authority in the new government, overseeing the armed forces, police, and the prosecutor’s office. 
Read complete article below
Michel Chossudovsky,  March 5, 2014

Ukraine’s “Democratic Coup d’Etat”: Killing Civilians as a Pretext for Regime Change
Global Research, February 26, 2014
With the support of Washington, Ukraine’s opposition “transitional government” headed by the parliament’s speaker Oleksandr Turchinov has issued an arrest warrant directed against the democratically elected President Viktor Yanukovych, accusing him of having ordered the “mass murder” of civilians during the bloody riots and clashes with police forces on Maidan Independence Square.
This “mass murder” for which he is accused bears the fingerprints of the Right Sector and Neo-Nazi party Svoboda, which is supported and financed through various channels by the US and the EU.
The Maidan riots as well as the riots organized in other parts of the country were carefully staged with a timeline and specific political objectives in mind. Civilian casualties were part of this staged agenda, with a view to accusing president Yanukovych of “mass murder”, thereby providing a justification for regime change on humanitarian grounds.
Armed with riot shields and clubs, the [Neo-Nazi] group’s cadres have manned the front lines of the Euromaidan battles this month, filling the air with their signature chant: “Ukraine above all!”  (See Max Blumental, Is the US backing Neo-Nazis in Ukraine? Alternet, February 25, 2014)
The preparations for this “democratic Coup d’Etat” had been carefully coordinated between the US State Department (and Western intelligence) and various political actors in Ukraine including the Svoboda party.
Violence escalated on the 18th of February after Right Sector Neo-Nazi rioters and thugs attempted to take over the Ukrainian parliament building (Verkhovna Rada). They were repelled by the anti-riot police. According to RT “the move came despite the agreement on amnesty finally reached between the government and the opposition.”
The rioters then stormed and looted the nearby unprotected office of the ruling Party of Regions, also setting it on fire. One office worker was later found dead in the devastated building, with reports saying he died from smoke inhalation.  The clashes soon grew bloody, with footage showing masked rioters firing rifles and pistols at the police in central Kiev and reports describing dead protesters with gunshot wounds. (RT, February 20, 2014)
Click to view video: http://youtu.be/yCzIIFAsGk4
The Sniper Killings
On the 20th of February, according to reports, more than twenty protesters were killed by professional snipers. This was not a spontaneous event resulting from clashes between protesters and riot police, nor was it marked by an exchange of gunfire between the police and Neo-Nazi militia.
The sniper killings had the hallmarks of a carefully planned operation. They happened within ‘the space of a few hours”. Moreover, the killings coincided with the meetings of President Viktor Yanukovych with a high level EU delegation. In a bitter irony, these targeted killings were used as a pretext to topple the government and issue an arrest warrant directed against president Yanukovych .
Who was behind these targeted sniper killings of innocent civilians? What was the underlying purpose? The Daily Telegraph reported that on the 20th of February:
at least 21 protesters were killed in the space of a few hours”…”… ten corpses were laid out on the pavement beneath the awning of a cafe on the northern edge of Independence Square, where thousands of demonstrators are still camped. At least three of the bodies displayed single bullet wounds to the heads.
The report suggests that the deaths were the result of a precise targeted killing operation pointing to the work of professional snipers:
One demonstrator, who gave his name as Andreiy, carried in one body on a green military stretcher. “He died between 90 minutes and two hours ago,” he told a Telegraph reporter. “These are all live rounds. You can see what they do. He and all the others were shot in the head, the neck or the heart. None were shot anywhere else like in the legs.” (Telegraph)
There were reports of snipers on rooftops using automatic weapons, but the identity of the snipers remains unknown. Invariably the Western media would refer, without evidence, to “government snipers”. Russia Today, however, confirmed the presence of both police and Neo-Nazi Svoboda gunmen in possession of automatic weapons.
The Western media, in chorus, without firm evidence and often contradicting their own reports, casually placed the blame on the Yanukovych government:
Protesters advanced on police lines in the heart of the Ukrainian capital Thursday, prompting government snipers to shoot back and kill scores of people in the country’s deadliest day since the breakup of the Soviet Union a quarter-century ago. (National Post, Feb 20, 2014)
Moreover, most of the Western media reports failed to acknowledge the role of armed Neo-Nazi gunmen and thugs who had integrated the protest movement and who were involved in systematically inciting violence.
We are dealing with a diabolical agenda: the deaths of protesters in Maidan square triggered by Neo-Nazi elements have been used to break the legitimacy of a duly elected government.
It was not in the interest of Yanukovych to order the targeted killings of civilians by roof-top snipers.
Underlying US foreign policy and CIA intelligence ops, civilian deaths are often triggered deliberately with a view to accusing the enemy and demonizing a foreign head of State or head of government
The Maidan sniper killings are, in this regard reminiscent of what occurred in Syria in mid-March 2011 at the very outset of the insurgency: civilians were killed by rooftop snipers in the border city of Daraa. The resulting casualties –without further investigation– were blamed on the government of Bashar al Assad. It was subsequently confirmed by Israeli and Lebanese press reports, that the  snipers were hired mercenaries.
The concept of killing civilians and placing the blame on the enemy goes back to Operation Northwoods (1962), a secret plan of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff titled “Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba”. ”The Top Secret memorandum (declassified) described U.S. plans to covertly engineer various pretexts that would justify a U.S. invasion of Cuba, including the assassination of Cubans living in the United States.
Neo-Nazi thugs at the forefront of Ukrainian protests
Neo-Nazi Militia in Ukraine
The Anti-Terrorist Operation
In mid-January the parliament adopted legislation with a view to curbing the protest movement.  The law also procedures pertaining to the registration of foreign non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the categorization of  NGOs “financed from abroad” and involved in political activity in Ukraine as “foreign agents” (Reuters, January 16, 2014)
But the law, which ran to more than 100 pages, appeared directed mainly at preparing the ground for action to end the street protests that have been taking place in the capital Kiev and some other cities since November.
On the 19th of February, following the several days of violence, the government instigated an Anti-terrorist Operation.
Alexander Yakimenko, head of Ukraine’s security agency intimated that the riots were being led by radical Neo-Nazi groups involved in “seizing buildings of local authorities, Interior Ministry, Security Service, prosecutor’s offices, military units, ammunition depots. Courthouses are being burnt, vandals are destroying private homes, killing civilians. Only during the last day 1,500 firearms and 100,000 cartridges have been taken by criminals. website of the SBU
“What is happening today is a conscious use of violence by way of arson, murder, hostage-taking and intimidation … for the sake of pursuing criminal goals… All of that with the use of firearms. These are not just signs of terrorism but concrete terrorist acts.  By their actions, radical and extremist groups bear a real threat to lives of millions of Ukrainians,”,” Alexander Yakimenko, , Ukraine’s security agency chief (SBU), website of the SBU, also quoted in the Los Angeles Times, February 19, 2014),
Armed rioter on the streets of Kiev on February 18.(Screenshot from YouTube video uploaded by Ukraine's Interior Ministry)Armed rioter on the streets of Kiev on February 18.(Screenshot from YouTube video uploaded by Ukraine’s Interior Ministry, courtesy RT)
Coincidentally, President Yanukovych had announced a “truce” and the holding of consultations with leaders of the opposition.
Upon the launching of the anti-terrorist operation on February 19,  police forces became actively involved in clearing out the Maidan and dismantling the barricades, leading to a confrontation between police forces and protesters.
While live ammunition was used by police against Neo-Nazi gunmen, the Western media acknowledges that the riot police used rubber bullets in its confrontation with rioters in Maidan square.
The Daily Telegraph accuses the government of being behind the sniper attacks, while also confirming in the same report that the riot police on the Maidan was using rubber bullets and water cannons with a view to dismantling the barricades:
Police responded by attacking the protest camp. Armed with water cannons, stun grenades and rubber bullets, police dismantled some barricades. But the protesters held their ground through the night, encircling the protest camp with new burning barricades of tires, furniture and debris.
On February 21, the Verkhovna Rada adopted a resolution banning the Security Council’s anti terrorist operation.
Reuters / Gleb Garanich
The Capture and Killing of Police Forces
Recorded casualties among policemen were high indicating that the rioters were in possession of fire arms. On February 19, Itar Tass quoting official sources confirmed that “Nine Ukrainian law enforcers died of gunshot wounds. 371 policemen turned for medical aid in departmental medical institutions, 349 of them were taken to hospital.”
The National Post  (February 20, 2014) confirms that “Ukraine protesters capture[d] 67 police as brief truce comes to a bloody end with at least 70 killed in latest clashes“.
What the report fails to mention is that the capture of riot police was not carried out by bona fide protesters, it was the coordinated by armed Neo-Nazi brown shirts.
The report quoting the Ministry of Health acknowledged that  “clashes between anti-government protesters and riot police in the capital Kiev left [Feb 20] at least 45 people dead, including three policemen” [in one day].
“three policemen were killed Thursday [Feb 20] and 28 suffered gunshot wounds, Interior Ministry spokesman Serhiy Burlakov told the AP”
The Ministry of Health subsequently confirmed that police deaths were in excess of ten with large numbers of wounded. EuroNews quoting official government sources said that police were also being targeted by unidentified snipers.
The police casualties signify that the “protesters” were in possession of fire arms and were targeting police. Moreover, the Telegraph also acknowledges that the protesters were involved in acts of arson and terrorism:
The latest bout of street violence began on Tuesday when protestersattacked police lines and set fires outside parliament, accusing Mr Yanukovych of ignoring their demands to enact constitutional reforms that would limit the president’s power – a key opposition demand. Parliament, dominated by his supporters, was stalling on taking up a constitutional reform to limit presidential powers.
Demonstrators, meanwhile, forced their way into the main post office on Kiev’s Independence Square, also known as the Maidan, after a nearby building they had previously occupied was burned down in fierce, fiery clashes late Tuesday with riot police. Thousands of activists armed with fire bombs and rocks had defended the square, a key symbol of the protests.
While the role of the Neo-Nazi party is not explicitly mentioned, the report tacitly acknowledges that “the more radical elements” were involved in acts of violence:
The ongoing violence on the square on Thursday indicates that more radical elements among the protesters may be unwilling to observe the truce and may not be mollified by the prospects of negotiations. Although the initial weeks of protests were determinedly peaceful, radicals helped drive an outburst of clashes with police in January in which at least three people died, and the day of violence on Tuesday may have radicalised many more
According to the Guardian,  armed gunmen belonging to the Svoboda party “prowled the upper floors of the hotel [Ukraina] with pistols, saying they were looking for police snipers.”
“Rioting youths set cars and lorries on fire and as the fires died down, they hacked the vehicles and hauled away the parts to erect new street barricades.”

Egypt Court to Hear Appeal to Label ’Israel’ a ’Terror State’

$
0
0

Local Editor

Egypt courtAn Egyptian court has slated March 26 for the first hearing of a lawsuit demanding that Egypt sever ties with neighboring Zionist entity and designate it a "terrorist state," according to the lawyer who raised the lawsuit, World Bulletin website reported.

Lawyer Hamed Seddiq told media outlets on Thursday that he had filed a lawsuit requesting that Egyptian authorities ban all "Israeli activity" in Egypt and declare the entity a "terrorist country."

The ban, said Seddiq, would include shutting down Tel Aviv's diplomatic offices in Egypt, including its Cairo embassy.

On Tuesday, the same Cairo court that will preside over the case released a verdict outlawing the activities of Palestinian resistance faction Hamas in Egypt and ordering all of the group's Egypt offices closed.

"The real terrorists are the Israelis, who have killed Palestinians and Arabs for refusing to recognize them," Seddiq said, adding that "listing Israel as a terrorist state is a national duty to protect [Egypt's] territorial unity."

In February, Egyptian authorities announced that they had uncovered and prosecuted a Zionist spy ring operating inside the country. The six Zionists charged in the case, including four military intelligence officers, are being tried in absentia.

Despite a 1979 peace treaty between Egypt and entity of occupation, the self-proclaimed Jewish 'state' is still seen in an overwhelmingly negative light by much of the Egyptian public.
This is due largely to its heavy-handed treatment of the Palestinian people and its ongoing occupation of Arab land.

Source: Websites
06-03-2014 - 14:58 Last updated 06-03-2014

Israeli soldiers open fire on children with live ammunition

$
0
0

Mohammad S, 17, was shot in the neck with live ammunition when an Israeli soldier shot directly at him from a distance of 20 meters (65 feet) on January 31 near Jalazoun refugee camp near Ramallah.
Ramallah, March 3, 2014—Three teenagers have been injured in recent weeks near Jalazoun refugee camp, indicating increasing instances of the use of live ammunition by Israeli soldiers against children.
On January 31, Mohammad E and Mohammad S, both 17, were protesting against the killing of Mohammad Mubarak two days earlier near Ein Siniya to the north of Jalazoun refugee camp. Israeli soldiers stationed at the southern entrance of the camp, where protestors frequently gather, opened fire with live ammunition causing injury to both boys.
In a sworn testimony given to DCI-Palestine, Mohammad E describes the actions of the Israeli forces. “Soldiers started firing tear gas canisters, live bullets and rubber bullets at us, and I was injured by a live bullet just below my right knee.” When a friend tried to carry him away from the soldiers, he too was shot in the shoulder.
Mohammad S was wounded on the same day, despite being an onlooker rather than a participant in the protest. Speaking to DCI-Palestine, he explained how Israeli soldiers were approaching the protestors in a jeep at full-speed when one soldier dismounted and shot directly at him from a distance of 20 meters (65 feet). Mohammad S only narrowly escaped a fatal injury. “I started running before I was stopped by a bullet that hit me in the back of the neck and exited from my throat.”
This was not an isolated event. Two weeks after Mohammad E was injured, his brother Ahmad, 14, and some friends had been on their way to a suburb of the camp to gather a crowd of boys for a game of soccer. On their way, they passed a deployment of Israeli soldiers and stopped to observe them from a distance of 100 meters (328 feet). The soldiers opened fire, according to Ahmad, injuring him in the leg with a live bullet that severed an artery.
“In 2013 four children died after being shot with live ammunition, while a further 30 sustained injuries,” said Ayed Abu Eqtaish, Accountability Program director at DCI-Palestine. “While Israeli forces repeatedly resort to the use of reckless force against civilians, including children, soldiers and police are rarely ever held accountable.”
The use of live ammunition by soldiers to fire at unarmed Palestinian children is an increasingly common occurrence in the areas around Jalazoun refugee camp and the Israeli settlement of Beit El situated nearby. The Israeli army’s own regulations dictate that live ammunition must be used “only under circumstances of real mortal danger,” but the regulations are not enforced and frequently ignored by Israeli soldiers.
These incidents follow the death in December 2013 of 15-year-old Wajih Wajdi al-Ramahi, also from Jalazoun camp. Documenting the killing, DCI-Palestine found that Wajih had been shot in the back from a distance of 150-200 meters (about 500 feet).
Since mid-2013, DCI-Palestine has been concerned over increasing violence by Israeli soldiers against Palestinian children living in refugee camps located in the occupied West Bank. Wajih’s killing and injuries such as Ahmad E’s show the impact of this violence. While Ahmad’s injury did not prove fatal, he is now confined to his bed and unable to walk. “I do not know what will happen next or how bad my injury is. Am I going to walk normally and play soccer again? Am I going to be crippled and never play soccer? This worries me a lot.”

U.S. restricts movement of Syria’s UN envoy for his performance in Geneva 2

$
0
0


Mar 06, 2014

Washington, (SANA) US State Department announced Wednesday that Washington decided to impose restrictions on Syria's Permanent Representative to the United Nations Bashar al-Jaafari within a 40-km radius of New York City.

This step indicates Washington’s fear of the success achieved by the Syrian diplomacy in terms of divulging the conspiracy hatched against Syria.

"We have delivered a diplomatic note to the Permanent Representative of the Syrian Mission to the United Nations in New York informing him that ... he is restricted to a 25-mile travel radius," said State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki.

Paski’s allegations that “Some other countries' UN envoys face similar restrictions including Iran and North Korea envoys,” do not justify such a move as no UN sanctions are imposed on Syria.

This step also poses questions in terms that the USA utilizes the presence of the UN HQ on its territory for restricting the work of the diplomatic missions of the UN member states.

Al-Moallem: What Syria's delegation to Geneva did was part of its national duty 
Damascus, (SANA) Deputy Prime Minister, Foreign and Expatriates Minister Walid al-Moallem said what Syria's official delegation to Geneva conference did was part of its national duty
...Read more

نارام سرجون – رصاصة واحدة في الجولان.. السعودية وعظام الديناصور

$
0
0




نارام سرجون

ما أجمل إشارات الاستفهام وإشارات التعجب عندما تقف تتحدى العقل والفطرة.. وما أجمل وقفة “لماذا” بكل قسوتها وهيبتها في بداية الكلام.. وما أروع تحدي “كيف” التي تشبه القضاة الصارمين.. وطوبى لتحريض “متى” على الشك والتمرد.. وهل لجبروت “هل” من مثيل في نواصي الكلام؟؟.. بل هل أبالغ إن قلت بأن أجمل تاج ترتديه العبارات هو تلك الإشارة العظيمة التي تشبه الصولجان وتسمى إشارة الاستفهام؟؟.. وليس مفاجئا أن نعرف أن أهم اكتشاف في علم الكتابة على الإطلاق هو إشارة الاستفهام.. لأنها هي التي قادت ثورات العقل البشري وفتوحاته الكبرى.. وثوراته كلها.. وهي التي هدمت الأوهام.. وبسببها يستعد المريخ للاستسلام للإنسان..
فما أعنف الكلام الذي يتسلح بإشارات الاستفهام ويشهر إشارات التعجب كالسيوف.. وكم هي جليلة مواكب الكلام التي تجرها أبهى الخيول المطهمة.. خيول لماذا وكيف ومتى وهل.. فاسمحوا لي أن أقدم لكم قادة الكلام.. وملوك البيان.. وزعماء الثورات.. أدوات الاستفهام والتعجب.. التي لاتقهر..
لا يكره الأغبياء شيئا في الوجود مثل إشارات وأدوات الاستفهام لأنها تصيب العقول البليدة بالشلل والصدمة والفالج لما فيها من كمية هائلة من الكهرباء والطاقة والصدمات عالية التوتر.. فكهرباء اللغة وبيوت طاقتها ومناراتها هي في “اللماذا” و”الكيف” و”العلام” وأيّان ووو.. وليس في الحكايات والروايات التي ترويها شهرزاد.. والجزيرة.. والعربية.. وصحف الربيع العربي.. ونشرات بان كيمون البائسة..
ما دعاني إلى أن أستل إشارات الاستفهام والتعجب من أغمادها.. وأن أخرجها كالكنوز المخبأة.. هو ما سمعته من هراء نطق به ممثل المملكة العربية الإسرائيلية (السعودية) في الأمم المتحدة في سياق سجاله مع الدكتور بشار الجعفري.. وكان ماقاله ممثل المملكة سببا في اكتشافي لكنوز من الأسئلة وإشارات الاستفهام التي كانت دفينة تحت رمال الزمن.. فالرجل قال (في سياق رده على الاتهامات السورية للسعودية بالتنسيق مع الموقف الإسرائيلي في الأزمة السورية والتوتر في المنطقة) بأن السعوديين يعرفون كيف تم إسكات الجولان السوري أربعين عاما خدمة لإسرائيل.. كما أن دور النظام السوري وتنسيقه مع الإسرائيليين بهذا الشأن لا نقاش فيه.. أي أن المندوب السعودي لا فض فوه يريد أن يعيد اختراع العجلة التي اخترعتها الثورة السورية عن قصة “الأربعين عاما” الصامتة في الجولان.. وقصة “الرصاصة الواحدة التي لم تطلق في الجولان”.. وطبعا طرحها المندوب السعودي بصيغة اليقين والعارف ببواطن الأمور.. وبنبرة المقهور الذي أفرج عن سر يقتله..
أرجو ألا تتوقعوا مني أن أناقش السعوديين والثورجيين بشأن الجولان.. ولا تتوقعوا مني أن أذكّرهم مثلا بتجربة السيد حسن نصر الله عندما قام بإشعال جنوب لبنان عام 2006.. فأصيبت السعودية كلها بالهستيريا وأقامت الدنيا ولم تقعدها على مغامرة حزب الله غير المحسوبة بدل أن تبارك محاولته الشجاعة.. واستشرست المملكة في معاقبة حزب الله على تحريكه للحرب ومنعت الأوامر الملكية السعودية الطائرات التي تمر بالأجواء السعودية وتحمل ذخائر إيرانية لحزب الله من المرور في أجوائها.. ووصل الأمر حدا جنونيا فمنعت نفس الأوامر الملكية رجال الدين حتى من الدعاء له في المساجد في إشارة مبطنة للدعاء عليه.. 

وهذا ما أغضب الرئيس الأسد فأطلق على حكام المملكة توصيفه الشهير (أنصاف الرجال) الذي التصق بهم ولن يرحل عنهم حتى يرحلوا.. وبالطبع لن أعيد على مسامع المندوب السعودي ومملكته وملكه المتعب كيف أننا وقفنا وحيدين في الجولان منذ أن خرجت مصر إلى كامب ديفيد ومات الاتحاد السوفييتي بالسكتة القلبية.. وتاه العراق في السباحة على شط العرب يتشاجر مع إيران قبل أن يقتل في الكويت.. ووقف رعاة البقر بعدها خلف ظهرنا في العراق ودفعوا البقر نحونا من لبنان عبر ثيران الحئيأة والاستئلال والمستأبل.. فيما كان أنصاف الرجال لا يسألون عن الجولان ولا عن الرصاصة الواحدة التي لم تنطلق في الجولان..
ولاشك أن كل إشارات الاستفهام وأدوات التعجب في كل لغات العالم قد أمضت مجتمعة ليلة من الضحك من اتهام مندوب السعودية لسورية بالتقصير في مواجهة العدو الصهيوني.. وقد رأيت بنفسي أن “كيف” انقلبت على ظهرها من شدة الضحك.. وأن “هل” كانت تدمع من فرط الضحك وكأنها تسمع لسرحان عبد البصير وهو يردد عبارته الشهيرة وهو يغمز بعينيه: أن المملكة العربية السعودية “متعودة دايما” على النضال.. والمقاومة..
وقد تداولت اللغة أن “لماذا” قد أغمي عليها وهي تضحك حتى ازرق وجهها.. وهي ترى مسلسل “مملكة ضايعة” حيث انتهى مسلسل أم الطنافس.. لأن مسلسل طنافس آل سعود قد بدأ..
لقد أوحى كلام المندوب السعودي وكأنه مطلع على أسرار غض الطرف السوري عن الإسرائيليين في الجولان..ومن يسمع الرجل وبيانات السعودية ولهجة التخوين في محطة العربية وكيف تشرح للناس تخاذل النظام السوري عن تحرير الجولان الذي يردد الجميع الآن نفس العبارة في اللوح المحفوظ (أربعون عاما لم تطلق رصاصة واحدة) يعتقد أن السعودية كانت على مدى أربعين عاما توبخ النظام السوري على سكوت الجولان وتمارس الضغوط عليه لفتح الجبهة.. وكانت تدعو الجامعة العربية لطرد النظام السوري الذي يعاند في إطلاق تلك “الرصاصة العزيزة” على قلب المملكة وقلوب الثوار التي لم يطلقها النظام السوري في الجولان..
ومن كثرة تفجع المملكة وتألمها على الجولان وتضييع فرصة الجهاد في فلسطين عدت إلى ملفاتي ومذكراتي ورفوف الزمن لا لأبحث عن رواية “آلام فرتر” لأقرأها.. أو لأعيد قراءة “العبرات” و”النظرات” لمصطفى لطفي المنفلوطي.. ولا لأفتش عن كتاب ناصر السعيد الشهير.. بل كنت أبحث في كل كتب التاريخ عن أسماء المواقع التي شهدت معارك إسرائيلية سعودية خلال مئة سنة فلم أتعثر باسم موقعة واحدة.. وهنا دعوني أستل سؤالا من الأسئلة التي تشبه أسئلة تشارلز داروين التي حطمت الكتب المقدسة.. وتشبه سؤال نيوتن عن الجاذبية الذي بنى الفيزياء المقدسة.. وهو سؤال اتفقت أدوات الاستفهام على إيفاده نيابة عنها لفخامة المندوب وملكه وجميع آل أنصاف الرجال.. هذا السؤال هو: كم هو عدد الشهداء السعوديين الذين سقطوا على أرض فلسطين حتى هذه اللحظة؟؟.
المملكة تبحث عن رصاصة واحدة لم تطلق في الجولان.. وأنا أبحث عن اسم شهيد سعودي واحد سقط برصاصة إسرائيلية.. بحثت عن أسماء الشهداء السعوديين الذين سقطوا على تراب فلسطين لأقارنهم بما قدمنا في سورية في معركتنا ضد إسرائيل من أجل فلسطين.. فلم أجد اسما واحدا.. كلما كنت أمد يدي إلى رفوف الذاكرة أفتش عن اسم سعودي واحد قتلته إسرائيل أو سعودي واحد أسرته إسرائيل فلم أجد.. عن سعودي قاتل في إسرائيل أو شد الرحال للجهاد في فلسطين لم أجد.. لم توجد حادثة واحدة على مدى الصراع العربي الصهيوني قام فيها سعودي بصفع إسرائيلي.. مئة عام كاملة ولا يوجد خدش واحد تسببت به السعودية أو رعاياها لإسرائيل.. وبعد هذا يبكي السعوديون على صمت الجولان والرصاصة العزيزة التي لم تنطلق..

بالأسماء.. القتلى السعوديين في سوريا

وبتوسيع دائرة السؤال نصل إلى سؤال خطير آخر هو: كم هو عدد الشهداء الخليجيين عموما (من مجلس التعاون الخليجي العظيم) في الصراع العربي الصهيوني حتى هذه اللحظة؟؟ أو أعطوني اسما واحدا فقط من مجلس التعاون الخليجي سقط في عملية استشهادية في إسرائيل.. أو كان أسيرا.. أو استشهد وسميت مدرسة باسمه أو شارع.. أو صفع إسرائيليا أو كتب شعارا على جدار.. أو سافر عبر الأنفاق ليعطي شمعة لفلسطيني لا صاروخا.. فلم أجد.. صدقا لم أجد..
لا أدري إن كانت هناك مؤامرة بعثية أو ناصرية أو قومية أو شيوعية لطمس تضحيات “الشعب السعودي والقيادة السعودية” وقيادات الخليج العربي المحتل في مشروع الجهاد ضد العدو الصهيوني.. ولكن منذ أن نهضت ذاكرتي وحملت رفوفها ملايين اللحظات المؤلمة وملايين الومضات المشرقة والأحداث والأسماء إلا أنني لم أعثر على اسم شهيد واحد سعودي طيب بدمه ثرى فلسطين.. لا أذكر.. قسما لا أذكر.. ولا حتى شهيد واحد من مجلس التعاون الخليجي الموقر الذي حارب أبناؤه في كل المعمورة إلا في فلسطين..

    تخيلوا أن هناك مقاتلين يابانيين قاتلوا في فلسطين..  
كوزو أو موتو
وهناك شهداء أمريكيون مثل راتشيل كوري التي سحقت تحت بلدوزر وهي تدافع عن بيوت الفلسطينيين..
وهناك شهداء انكليز من أصول انغلوساكسونية قتلوا في فلسطين مثل الناشط توم هوراندال الذي كان يرمي الحجارة على الجنود الإسرائيليين..
وفنزويليون وعلى رأسهم كارلوس الشهير الذي يقضي عقوبة بالسجن المؤبد في فرنسا بسبب انضمامه لنشاط الجبهة الشعبية لتحرير فلسطين.. وهناك كوبيون.. وإيرانيون.. ومن كل البلاد العربية إلا دول الخليج العربي وبالذات السعودية.. وإن كان هناك من أسماء شهداء أو معارك لم أسمع بها فربما لأن السعودية “الشقيقة” قد أهملت هذا الجانب المضيء في شعبها وعتمت عليه لأنها لا تريده أن ينمو ولا تريده أن يصبح جزءا من ثقافة شعبية.. ولكن بالفعل لا يوجد شيء واحد في الوجود اسمه معركة أو كتيبة سعودية قدمت شهداء ضد إسرائيل.. 

يعني أستطيع أن أقول لكم وكلي يقين أنه يمكن أن نكتشف عظام ديناصورات
 أو ماموث في فلسطين ولا يمكن اكتشاف مستحاثة أو بقايا عظام من أصل “سعودي” أو لحية سعودية أو عقالا من عقالاتهم.. فما هذه الظاهرة الغريبة؟؟.. وما هو السر الذي يمنع الشعب السعودي بملايينه من تقديم قربان واحد ضد إسرائيل؟؟ رصاصة واحدة فقط منذ نشوء إسرائيل لم تنطلق من بندقية سعودية على مدى مئة سنة كاملة من الصراع العربي الصهيوني الذي بدأ في بدايات القرن الماضي.. وكان المتطوعون السوريون والمصريون والعراقيون واللبنانيون يتدفقون إلى فلسطين.. ولكن غابت السعودية كليا وكأنها غير موجودة على الخارطة الجهادية.. وغاب شبابها نهائيا.. ولا تستطيع المملكة المباهاة حتى بشهيد واحد على مدى قرن كامل.. أليس هذا شيء يدعو إلى التعجب والاستفهام؟؟ أليس هذا العار فوق كل عار؟؟.
السوريون والمصريون واللبنانيون هم أكثر من ضحى واستشهد في فلسطين.. وكل رصاصة أطلقت في فلسطين أطلقتها من فوهات البنادق أصابع سورية ولبنانية ومصرية ومن كل العرب إلا عرب الخليج وبالذات أبناء المملكة السعودية.. كل الرصاص الذي لم تنم جفونه حول إسرائيل منذ مئة سنة هو في بنادق السوريين وحلفائهم..
هل يمكن أن تتخيلوا مثلا أن نقرأ خبرا يقول التالي:

“بعد اعتداء المستوطنين الإسرائيليين على المسجد الأقصى اشتبكت القوات العربية السعودية مع لواء غولاني
 الإسرائيلي وخاضت معارك ضارية معها.. وقد تمكنت القوات السعودية المدرعة البطلة من تدمير ست دبابات ميركافا.. فيما تمكنت طائرات تايفون التي حصلت عليها المملكة من التصدي لغارات الطيران الإسرائيلي وأجبرتها على الانكفاء بعد إسقاط طائرتين إسرائيليتين.. وقد تم أسر الطيارين إلا أن جيش محمد (وهو ميليشيا شعبية إماراتية وكويتية وقطرية) قام بذبح الطيارين الإسرائيليين.. وفيما كان رجال المغاوير السعوديون يغيرون على المواقع الإسرائيلية نفذ استشهادي سعودي من آل العنزي عملية جريئة ضد قافلة من الجيش الإسرائيلي.. وقد استشهد من جراء هذه المعارك عشرون جنديا سعوديا.. وتردد أن الأمير بندر بن سلطان هدد بإحراق نصف إسرائيل إن هي تجرأت على اقتحام المسجد الأقصى أو لمسه.. فيما قام خادم الحرمين الشريفين بدعوة مجلس الأمن للانعقاد في جلسة طارئة ورتب زيارة عاجلة يجول لها على عواصم القرار.. ونوه إلى أن على العالم.. الخ”.. أليس هذا خيالا من خيالات شهرزاد؟؟.. وقصص سندباد وعلي بابا وأفلام الكرتون والرجل العنكبوت؟؟..
هل المشكلة في شعوب الجزيرة العربية أم في الحكومات؟؟ وماهو هذا الترياق والسم الذي شربه شعب الجزيرة العربية في كؤوس محمد بن عبد الوهاب؟؟ أين هو السر الذي لا نعرفه في سبب أن أبناء السعوديين قاتلوا في كل الدنيا وماتوا بعشرات الآلاف ولكنهم لا يرتاحون للجهاد في فلسطين؟.. ولماذا لا نسمع بشهيد إماراتي أو كويتي أو قطري استشهد في فلسطين؟؟.. لكننا نراهم يموتون كالذباب في تورا بورا وغابات الفلبين وأدغال كينيا وشوارع العراق وسورية ويناطحون أبراج نيويورك.. يموتون في كل أراضي “الجهاد” في العالم إلا في فلسطين؟؟ ويقاتلون كل الأمم إلا إسرائيل..!!!!!.. فيما سئمت ملاهي الدنيا ومقاهيها من تهتك سياح سعوديين وكل القادمين من بلاد النفط والغاز..
لا داعي لممارسة النفاق وإلقاء المبررات والاعتذاريات والمدائح العربية والثرثرة بأن الشعوب العربية ليست تعكس وجهة نظر الحكام.. فأمامي ظاهرة غريبة تحتاج إلى تفسير.. كيف لا يوجد مواطن سعودي واحد فقط فكر في أن يتمرد على الناموس الذي أقرته حكومة المملكة وحكومات الخليج..؟؟ وفي نفس الوقت كيف يتدفق عشرات الآلاف من أبناء السعودية لذبح السوريين والعراقيين واللبنانيين وإعلاء كلمة الله.. إلا في إسرائيل؟؟.. أليس لله كلمة في إسرائيل؟؟؟.. أعتقد أن السر الكبير يكمن في الدور القذر للعائلة المالكة السعودية التي قامت بعملية استئصال كاملة لروحالأمة.. وقامت بأكبر عملية تحنيط لمجتمع كامل بكل ملايينه.. حتى تحول إلى مجتمع غريب محنط يكره كل العالم ويكرهه كل العالم.. يقاتل حيث يجب ألا يقاتل ويغيب حيث يجب ألا يغيب..
الملوك دوما يحاولون تحنيط البنادق والعقول.. فالملك حسين كان دوما يحاول أن يستنسخ النموذج السعودي لتحنيط الأردنيين بالتدريج لكنه كان مرغما على لعب أدوار البطولة العسكرية أمام الشعب الأردني.. فهو لم يكن له خيار لأنه موجود في بلاد تنتمي ثقافيا وتاريخيا إلى بلاد الشام وهي خزان رصاص الشرق واللعب بمزاج الرصاص خطر.. وهناك التحام بين فلسطين والأردن وسورية.. وعندما حاول جده التلاعب والتنسيق مع الوكالة اليهودية تذوق رصاصات “مصطفى عشو” الذي نفذ فيه القصاص لأنه تخاذل وخدع الشعب الفلسطيني.. ولكن الملك حسين المحتال والمراوغ كان يفاجأ بالأحداث التي تجره إلى الحرب دون إرادته ويقدم فيها الأردنيون الشهداء رغما عنه.. والبطل مشهور الحديثي الذي صنع معركة الكرامة الشهيرة صنعها لأنه تمرد على قرار الملك بالنأي بالنفس عن مواجهة الإسرائيليين.. فأنجز نصرا رغما عن الملك والمملكة الهاشمية النائية بنفسها.. فأسقط في يد الملك وهو يتحول إلى ملك للمقاومة على غير توقع ودون رغبته أو إرادته.. ولكن الملك صادر البطولة من مشهور الحديثي وتفاخر بالشهداء من أجل فلسطين.. وفي نفس الوقت قام بإحالة الحديثي على المعاش.. ومن يومها لم تقدم المملكة إنجازا عسكريا ونأت بنفسها نأيا مابعده نأي.. ولم يغامر ضابط أردني على الذهاب مبكرا إلى المعاش.. وقطع دابر “الكرامة” وكل من يريد أن يكون (مشهورا)..
أما السعودية فليس فيها مشهور حديثي واحد.. ولا يوجد فيها من تطوع أو أرسلته المملكة للقتال ضد إسرائيل.. والكتيبة التي أرسلتها السعودية في نهاية حرب تشرين إلى سورية كانت مثل تمثيليات أردوغان وبطولاته وعنترياته الخشبية ولم تشارك في إطلاق رصاصة واحدة.. وقد روى لي ضباط سوريون زاروا تلك القطعة العسكرية السعودية التي تموضعت على الأراضي السورية أنها لم تكن مخولة بإطلاق النار.. وكان أفرادها منهمكين في الطبخ.. وصيد العصافير.. كان جيشا يستحق الشفقة والرثاء.. ولم يكن لهم هم القتال ولا المواجهة والشهادة بل العودة إلى المملكة لقيادة سياراتهم الأمريكية..
القضية ليست في غضب المملكة على صمت الجولان فالسعودية لا تكترث بالجولان وهو لا يساوي عندها أكثر من جزيرتي تيران وصنافير السعوديتين المحتلتين مع الجولان السوري منذ عام 1967.. ولم تطلق السعودية يومها رصاصة واحدة لا قبل الاحتلال ولا بعده.. ولم تطلق كلمة واحدة.. أو شكوى واحدة.. أو حتى ريحا.. وكأنهما غرقتا في البحر الأحمر في زلزال..
ويخطئ من يعتقد أن للسعودية ثأرا مع الرئيس بشار الأسد.. السعودية بالتأكيد ليس لها ثأر شخصي مع الرئيس
 الأسد بسبب وصفه للعائلة المالكة بأنصاف الرجال.. بل تريد المملكة إسقاطه لأسباب لها علاقة بوضعها الوظيفي الإقليمي.. فالحكم السعودي على بداوته ليست له كرامة الرجال الذين يثأرون لكبريائهم بدليل أن الملك (نصف الرجل) جاء إلى دمشق رغم أنه عرف أن الأسد يراه “نصف رجل” ولم يعتذر من هذا التوصيف.. وقد بالغ الملك في الثناء على الرئيس الأسد وأطنب في المديح له لأن المطلوب من المملكة في تلك المرحلة من قبل الأمريكيين هو أن تقنع الأسد وتستميله لكي ينضم إلى نادي“أنصاف الرجالقبل أن تنضج مرحلة نادي النعاج.. أو نادي “النائين بأنفسهم”.. 
وقد قال الملك عبدالله (أبو متعب) فيما قال للأسد -حسب تسريبات- بأنه ليس من الضروري أن يصالح الأسد الإسرائيليين ولا أن يبرم اتفاق سلام معهم ولكن يمكنه أن يقطع علاقته بإيران وحزب الله ويعوض عن هذه العلاقة بالصديق الجديد أردوغان وبحركة حماس.. وبدل إيران تتقدم تركيا لمؤازرته بكل ثقلها.. وبدل التحالف مع حزب الله الذي يثبت كتف إسرائيل في الشمال تتولى حماس نفس الدور إنما من جنوب إسرائيل.. أي المعادلة الملكية جدا بسيطة: اترك إيران وحزب الله وسيحل محلهما تركيا وحماس.. ولا يكون الأسد حسب زعم الملك قد خسر شيئا من قوته تجاه إسرائيل بل سيكون قد كسب الكثير لأنه سيحرر نفسه من الحرج ضمن محور شيعي.. ليتحالف مع محور سني صرف وهذا ماسيحرر المملكة من نفس الضيق والحرج أمام المدارس الوهابية التي لن ترتاح لمواقف سعودية فيها اختلاط بالموقف الإيراني والشيعي.. وهذا ماسيضع حتى إسرائيل في ورطة لأنها لا تستطيع القول إنها تواجه الخمينية بل تواجه العثمانية بإرثها العظيم وتأثيرها في نفوس المسلمين “السنة”..
ويقال عن راوي الحديث بأن الأسد استمع للملك بهدوء وتركه يسرد وجهات نظره “الثاقبة” وقد أدرك الأسد أن الملك الأمّي المتعب (نصف الرجل) والذي لا يستطيع تأليف (نصف جملة).. لا يمكن أن يكون بهذه العبقرية وأنه حتما قد تم تلقينه هذا الكلام المفخخ من قبل جهة ثالثة تريد شرا بنا.. وقد بدا ذلك في رده عندما قال للملك لامباليا بعرضه بأنه يرى بأن من الأفضل أن تجتمع تركيا وإيران وسورية والسعودية ومصر وحزب الله وحماس على نفس الموقف طالما أن الغاية هي فلسطين وأن خسارة نصف هذه القوة عبثي وليس له مبرر في الوقت الذي تجمع إسرائيل حولها كل قوى الغرب (المسيحي) وهي دولة (يهودية).. أما نحن فنقسم الحلفاء إلى سنة وشيعة.. كما أن إسرائيل على العكس قد تفكر عندها في استمالة إيران لأن اقتراح الملك (نصف الرجل) هو في الحقيقة مشروع لحصار إيران وليس إسرائيل التي ستستغل هذا الحصار لتسترد إيران.. وقد يتسبب ذلك بنهوض نزعة فارسية تعززها إسرائيل بأي ثمن ونعود إلى أيام الشاه ونفس السيناريو والعداء العربي الفارسي العبثي..
الوظيفة السعودية كانت تشتيت الجهد السوري وما إن يتفكك تحالفه مع محور المقاومة حتى تنقلب تركيا وحماس ويبقى وحيدا فيؤكل الجيش السوري والشعب السوري وتتفتت سورية على غرار ليبيا والعراق اللذين سقطا بسهولة لأنهما كانا بلا حلفاء.. 

وبعدها يأتي دور مصر.. لأن الجيوش الثلاثة التي يجب تحطيمها هي الجيوش الثلاثة الرئيسية العربية العراق ومصر وسورية.. كي تصمت كل الجيوش ولا تطلق رصاصة واحدة.. في كل الشرق الأوسط.. ويتحول العراق وسورية ومصر إلى جولان عملاق.. لا تحيط به رصاصة واحدة..
لذلك وكما هو واضح فإن تحطيم أكاذيب العرب وثوار العرب لا تقوم به الدبابات والبلدوزرات والسيارات المفخخة.. بل كلمات مثل: كيف.. وهل.. ولماذا.. وكم.. ومتى..
فلماذا لا يطلق الثوار رصاصة واحدة في الجولان على إسرائيل ويحرجون الأسد برصاصة واحدة نحو جندي إسرائيلي.. رصاصة واحدة فقط كافية لإحراج الأسد الذي لم يطلق جيشه رصاصة واحدة.. ثوار السعودية الآن هم في الجولان وعلى تماس مع جيش نتنياهو.. ولا يقدر الأسد كما تدعي السعودية على منع المجاهدين من الوصول إلى الجولان وفلسطين.. لا يحتاج ثوار السعودية في الجولان سوى رصاصة واحدة في الاتجاه الصحيح.. نحو الجنوب.. وليس نحو الشمال.. إنني أتحداهم.. وكلنا نتحداهم.. والعالم يتحداهم.. ويتحدى أنصاف الرجال.. وأنصاف النساء..
متى ستطلق السعودية رصاصة واحدة فقط في صنافير وتيران؟؟ كم انتحاريا سعوديا قتل نفسه في فلسطين؟؟.. وكيف لا تصدر فتوى جهاد واحدة لشباب المسلمين نحو تحرير الجولان؟؟.. وعلام.. ومتى..
إن أكبر عدو لثوار العرب وثورات ملوك النفط والغاز هي أدوات الاستفهام العنيدة القاسية وإشاراتها المهيبة وعبوسها الرهيب.. بل في سخريتها اللاذعة.. التي تحاكمهم وتحاكم مشروعهم ومشروعيتهم.. وتحاكم قراراتهم ودمويتهم وعمالتهم وخيانتهم وغباءهم الذي أوصل مجتمعاتهم إلى الخراب والدمار الأقصى والتشظي والتحنيط.. والمعركة التي بيننا وبينهم هي من أجل ألا تموت أدوات الاستفهام من اللغة ويجري دفنها.. فالمصيبة التي يريدون إيجادها هي فرض أجوبة جاهزة علينا وإعدام أدوات الاستفهام وخلق ثقافة أن زمن الأسئلة انتهى لأن الثورة بزعمهم أجابت على كل الأسئلة وأحالت كل إشارات الاستفهام والتعجب إلى التقاعد.. فالثورة حملت معها زمنا تموت فيه الأسئلة.. بعد أن تذبح كيف ومتى لأنها من أدوات الشك وتكسير اليقين.. ولا يقين بعد يقين الثوار.. وبعد أن تنكح “لماذا”.. وتملك “أين” و”علام” ملك اليمين.. ويستحوذ على “هل” كما يستحوذ خليفة عثماني على غلام أمرد..
أما نحن فإننا هدمنا الربيع بأدوات الاستفهام الرهيبة فقط.. هدمنا الجزيرة وهدمنا الإخوان المسلمين وهدمنا الخيانات.. ونحن من أوقف الحمير التي حملت أسفار الثورة.. وسنهدم بصولجان الاستفهام ممالك الحمير وقلاعهم.. فلا شيء يهدم هذا الجنون العربي وهذا الربيع وهذه الممالك العاهرة مثل الكلام الذي تقوده أسئلة ثائرة.. فائرة.. هادرة.. أسئلة تهدم الممالك.. وترميها في المهالك

Snipers for US regime change in Ukraine

$
0
0
Crisis in Ukraine
Crisis in Ukraine

By Finian Cunningham

Thu Mar 6, 2014 11:34AM GMT

The irony could not be more bitter - or sickening. US Secretary of State John was photographed laying wreaths in Kiev this week and offering "heartfelt" condolences for those killed during recent violent street clashes in the Ukrainian capital.

It now turns out that the killing of protesters and police officers was carried out by covert snipers working for the new Western-backed junta that seized power in Kiev. Kerry was thus laying flowers in memory of victims who were shot on the orders of the very people whom the West has been sponsoring.

John Kerry visiting shrine in Kiev, laying flowers. Woman tells me 'we want moral support from USA at very least'

Dozens of people were fatally wounded in Kiev's Maidan Square last month during clashes between security forces loyal to the then incumbent President Viktor Yanukovych. Western media uncritically, or worst knowingly, heightened claims by the organizers of the demonstrations against Yanukovych that the casualties were inflicted by police officers shooting into the crowds.

At the time there were grounds for suspicion that all was not what it seemed. The surge in killings was not in keeping with the relatively restrained conduct of security forces in Kiev during nearly three months of unprecedented street violence. But the outpouring of condemnation from Western politicians amplified by Western news media against the Ukrainian authorities had the effect of piling the political pressure on the Yanukoyvch government to capitulate.

The new administration in Kiev, led by so-called interim Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, has now been dubbed the legitimate government of Ukraine by Washington and the European Union.

Revelations about the covert snipers have since been disclosed in a leaked phone call between EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and Estonia's foreign minister Usmar Paet.
In the phone conversation dated February 25, and reported by Russia Today this week, Paet is heard to say: "There is now stronger and stronger understanding that behind the snipers, it was not Yanukovych, but it was somebody from the new [Western-backed] coalition."



Ashton replies: "I think we do want to investigate. I mean, I didn't pick that up, that's interesting. Gosh."

This is by no means the first such evidence that violence in Kiev was orchestrated. There is already ample proof that the US and EU were covertly working to agitate protests against the Ukrainian government.  For three months, Western politicians have been issuing statements to whip up demonstrations. Western officials have paraded in Kiev with fascist elements and given the provocateurs legitimacy to carry out outrageous acts of violence against government people and property that would not be tolerated for a second back in their own countries.

The involvement of the American CIA and its various offshoots, such as the National Endowment for Democracy, has also been well documented in Ukraine going back to at least the early 1990s.

The precipitous deployment of organized violence by "protesters" from late November onwards, allegedly as a result of the Yanukovych government rejecting an EU trade pact, also bears the hallmark of an externally driven regime change operation.

A decisive tipping point was reached against Yanukovych with the surge in killings among protesters - apparently by police gunfire – during the last week of February. Yanukovych had already signed a "national unity deal" on February 21 with opponents promising constitutional reforms. But that deal was not enough for his opponents who wanted Yanukovych out of office altogether.

In the wake of the street violence, US vice president Joe Biden reportedly phoned Yanukovych to tell him that it was game over. His efforts at cutting a deal were "a day late and a dollar short," said the voice from the White House. Yanukovych then fled to Russia within days of Biden's phone call.

The latest evidence of orchestrated violence in Kiev for political ends - the definition of terrorism - adds to Russia's claims that what the West has championed as "a people's revolution"is in actuality nothing but a Western-backed coup d'état by terrorism.

Russia's President Vladimir Putin this week said that the new regime occupying the government offices in Kiev is not legitimate. It represents an illegal seizure of power by violence.

That is why Russia is right to not recognize the usurpers in Kiev and to take security measures to protect ethnic Russians living in Ukraine and to defend its vital interests in the Crimean Peninsula. The unelected Western-backed regime, which Western media propagandize as "the fledgling government of Ukraine", comprises neo-Nazis who detest Russians and who have publicly stated their intention to commit the worst kind of violence against ethnic Russians and any other people whom they deem to obstruct their fascistic program of governance.

None of this vile demagoguery has deterred Western so-called democratic leaders from embracing the regime in Kiev. Far from it; this week saw British foreign secretary William Hague in Kiev shaking hands with Yatsenyuk, followed by US top diplomat John Kerry laying his grotesque commemorative wreaths to the dead.

Kerry also announced that he was bearing $1 billion in loan guarantees to support the junta in Kiev. The austerity-racked EU is somehow finding the coffers to offer $15 billion. These "loans" are being welcomed with open arms by the Western-backed junta in Kiev. They will enrich Western capitalists and the Ukrainian elite, like Yatsenyuk and the leaders of the Kiev storm troopers, while throwing the majority of Ukrainians into American and EU-style poverty.

Another condition for the Western financial bribery, as disclosed this week by the new Ukrainian ambassador to Belarus, Mykhailo Yeshel, is that Ukraine will allow US ballistic missiles on to its territory - right on the border with Russia.

What we are witnessing in Ukraine is an imperialist conquest by Washington and its European stooge governments - hand in fist with fascist boot boys.

Russia has every right to be concerned and to take action. Yet, ironically, this week Western media are falling over themselves to tell us that Russia has invaded Ukraine in "a brazen act of aggression".

No wonder the world seems chaotic when such barefaced Western lies and deception about reality are being churned out. Western "churnalism" at its best.
Viewing all 27504 articles
Browse latest View live